Trust
What RootAí is allowed to do — and what it is not.
If you are being asked to sign off on intelligence inside a quality system, this is the page you need. It describes boundaries, not ambitions.
An advisory layer inside a governed system.
It reads across the evidence you supplied and the governed sources available to an assessment. It operates inside the same access rules as everyone else — it does not see more than the person using it.
The boundaries, stated plainly
- It does not decide.
- No approval, no closure, no alteration of a controlled record.
- It separates what it knows from what it does not.
- A fact from your record, a gap in the evidence and an assumption are labelled as three different things.
- It does not upgrade its own advice.
- A RootAí recommendation cannot be presented as a regulatory requirement. The two are structurally different kinds of statement.
- It does not fill in numbers.
- Where a figure is needed and was not supplied, the output says data is required.
- It does not issue verdicts.
- No compliant, no non-compliant, no declared root cause.
An external source earns its place.
Authority, content type, currentness, topic relevance and applicability are established separately. Official is not the same as relevant, and current is not the same as binding.
Who can see it, who can act on it
Access to a module and authority to sign something off are separate controls. Judgments are recorded against a person, and the record keeps its history.
Human governance →For security and data-processing information not yet published here, contact QMSROOT at info@qmsroot.com.